Butterfly of Dreams Dommasandra Project Overview

Butterfly of Dreams is the publisher’s working name for a proposed mixed-use development at Dommasandra, off Sarjapur Road. The available planning information describes residential and commercial components across approximately 22.25 acres, with 1,188 proposed residential units. The name has not been confirmed as the project’s publicly announced identity, so every commercial or legal document should be checked against its own project name, company, phase and date before the working name is treated as equivalent.

The proposed built form comprises six residential towers and one commercial block. Residential Towers 1 to 5 are described with three basements, a ground floor and 36 upper floors; Tower 6 is described with three basements, a ground floor and 37 upper floors. The commercial block is described with four basements, a ground floor and 34 upper floors. These are planning-stage figures, not proof that construction has started or that a tower, floor, stack or home is currently offered.

The gross site area is approximately 22.25 acres, while the current document-supported net site area is approximately 21.73 acres. A minor conflicting transcription appears in the publisher’s report, so this guide uses the value supported by the current project documents. Buyers should keep gross and net area distinct: gross area describes the wider parcel, while net planning area is the more useful denominator when testing landscape, coverage and shared-space percentages.

The residential count of 1,188 units describes a proposed programme, not current inventory. It does not identify phase, tower allocation, bedroom mix, carpet area, saleable area, orientation or availability. A shortlist therefore needs a current schedule showing the legal project name, phase, tower, unit reference, configuration, area basis and revision date. Those identifiers should remain consistent across the plan, area statement, cost sheet and payment schedule.

Landscape is one of the clearer planning commitments. The proposal states approximately 8.73 acres of landscape, described as 40% of net site area, together with 800 proposed trees. This is a meaningful scale signal, but it is not a delivered landscape, final planting schedule, guaranteed view or promise that every home faces greenery. A current landscape plan should show how planted areas are distributed, which spaces sit at natural ground, how pedestrian routes connect them, and which portions belong to the relevant phase.

The proposed infrastructure includes a 2,020 KLD sewage treatment plant, a 1,020-cubic-metre rainwater sump and 22 recharge pits. These system-level figures help frame practical questions about water reuse, plant location, phasing, access for maintenance, noise buffers and operating responsibility. They do not establish completed capacity or performance. Ask how the system is divided between residential and commercial components and whether the selected phase depends on shared infrastructure delivered later.

IINSPIRA GOLD COUNTY LLP is the project company identified in the planning information. That neutral role is the only company relationship stated on this site. The company is not relabelled as developer, promoter, builder, seller or authorised channel, and the website does not attribute the project to another organization. Before relying on a sales representation, match the legal project company and promoter roles in the current registration and transaction documents.

The public name, launch position, registration identifier, possession date, construction status, prices, payment plan and availability remain unconfirmed. Those gaps do not erase the useful planning facts, but they determine how the facts should be used. The site scale, residential count, tower schedule, landscape allocation and utility programme can support an early planning comparison. They cannot support a booking decision until the legal identity and current commercial package are available together.

Start the document comparison with identity. Check the legal project name, project company, promoter role, survey details, phase and revision date. Then compare the sanctioned or currently issued master plan with the tower and unit plan. Finally match the area statement, specification, cost sheet, payment schedule and payment-recipient details to the same phase and unit. If any identifier changes between documents, request a reconciled set rather than combining attractive details from different revisions.

Use the working name as a navigation aid, not as a substitute for legal identity. A current project announcement may eventually confirm the name, replace it or attach it to a narrower phase. Until that happens, the most reliable buyer file is one in which every plan, approval and commercial sheet carries the same legal subject. This approach protects the useful early-stage context while avoiding assumptions about launch, affiliation or availability.